General :
K-Meleon Web Browser Forum
General discussion about K-Meleon
AdBlock Question ...
Date: March 07, 2011 04:36PM
Never used AdBlock before till last week ... I put the version on for KM 1.5.4 and the new version on for KM 1.6 Beta 2. I have noticed that when I open the KM browser now ... KM seems to take longer to open. This is not a complaint, just an observation. Am I right on this ... is there a connection and have others noticed this also? ... thanks
Re: AdBlock Question ...
Date: March 08, 2011 05:22PM
Quote
duffy98
Never used AdBlock before till last week ... I put the version on for KM 1.5.4 and the new version on for KM 1.6 Beta 2. I have noticed that when I open the KM browser now ... KM seems to take longer to open. This is not a complaint, just an observation. Am I right on this ... is there a connection and have others noticed this also? ... thanks
Hi, duffy98. I too tried using the AB+ version(?) for 1.6 and it
is apparently the cause of some problems with loading 1.6b2, even with the Loader.exe. The AB+ version(?) for 1.6 also seems to some times cause 1.6b2 to draw about 99% of CPU resources requiring a restart of the computer. I think I have read in this forum about some one else having this same problem. I have gone back to using 1.5.4 until 1.6 is in final release.
Charlie
~~If it ain't broke, why screw it up?~~
Re: AdBlock Question ...
Date: March 09, 2011 03:00AM
Thanks caktus for the info. I removed AdBlock Plus on KM 1.5.4 earlier today and it seems to have the speed back. I am also going to remove it from KM 1.6 B2 ... I like to switch between both KM browsers every so often. Yes, KM 1.6 will be better down the road with the final version. I hope 1.6 will have a "final" version ... I know there is talk of just going to v1.7. I don't know where v1.6 stands these days. It works OK for me ... it has flaws.
luk3Z ... also thanks for the info ... I read the links, not sure if I will remove all those items. I may just experiment one of these days, I have a backup of everything.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 03/09/2011 03:08AM by duffy98.
Re: AdBlock Question ...
Date: March 09, 2011 03:31AM
Charlie,
I don't see that level of CPU usage, but I am using KM 1.6beta1, not 2. I have the latest Adblock Plus installed and I see like 2 to 33 percent, not 99????
N
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 03/09/2011 03:31AM by ndebord.
Re: AdBlock Question ...
Date: March 09, 2011 09:51AM
I stopped using abp because of the long load time. It seems to be related to parsing its very complete black list. I bet if you make a black list of just the few most annoying sites, it will be faster. You never notice this on FF, bcuz it takes forever to load anyway....
Re: AdBlock Question ...
Posted by:
km2
Date: March 09, 2011 04:36PM
EasyList may cause some delay at start.
Re: AdBlock Question ...
Date: March 10, 2011 04:34AM
so you are claiming that even with the short list, you get a noticeable delay on startup?
Re: AdBlock Question ...
Date: March 10, 2011 05:14AM
Quote
snuz2
I stopped using abp because of the long load time. It seems to be related to parsing its very complete black list. I bet if you make a black list of just the few most annoying sites, it will be faster. You never notice this on FF, bcuz it takes forever to load anyway....
snuz2,
What do you call a long load time?
N
Re: AdBlock Question ...
Date: March 10, 2011 05:44AM
Quote
luk3Z
Quote
snuz2
I stopped using abp because of the long load time. It seems to be related to parsing its very complete black list. I bet if you make a black list of just the few most annoying sites, it will be faster. You never notice this on FF, bcuz it takes forever to load anyway....
I don't know why you use black list subscription.
I make my black list myself based on the web sites I was - so I know what is bocked and I don't need to block everything else (my list is short and fast).
I don't want to bock all internet websites/ads. This is my list:
http://tinypaste.com/fdcdc
Very good list....just what I was looking for!
Re: AdBlock Question ...
Date: March 10, 2011 04:17PM
luk3Z ... I put AdBlock Plus back on KM 1.5.4 today and I am going to use your list and see how that works. Might just be what I need. ... thanks
Re: AdBlock Question ...
Posted by:
km2
Date: March 10, 2011 04:55PM
Quote
snuz2
so you are claiming that even with the short list, you get a noticeable delay on startup?
That depend on installed subscriptions. Just don't use old subscriptions.
http://adblockplus.org/en/getting_started
And delay on startup, not always mean delay when surf.
Delete mozctl.dll (1.5.4) and K-M will start little faster.
Re: AdBlock Question ...
Date: March 23, 2011 04:20AM
Just want to be clear about which version of AdBlockPlus (ABP) should be used with KM 1.6.
I hear from some that adblockpluskmeleon-1.3.5b.157 is a memory or cpu hog. I know from personal experience that adblockplus adblockplus-kmeleon-1.2.2-en-US-unofficial-0.5 seems to work OK (missing the icon(s).
Anybody care to comment on what is the stable ABP for KM 1.6???
N
Re: AdBlock Question ...
Date: March 23, 2011 05:01PM
I haven't noticed memory leaks using 1.3.5 dev builds but try for yourself comparing both versions. BTW ABP 1.3.5 RC is out.
Re: AdBlock Question ...
Date: March 23, 2011 05:11PM
Quote
Matt
I haven't noticed memory leaks using 1.3.5 dev builds but try for yourself comparing both versions. BTW ABP 1.3.5 RC is out.
Matt,
I saw that only some of the posters were reporting problems. My temporary solution was to go back to the stable old release in the short term.
N