Quote
Al.
In respects to the themes I assembled both pre & post K-Ninja, in each instance if images or icons were borrowed from somebody elses themes, then I sent them a courtesy email asking if I could use their images etc, and then i waited for a reply. ... As it did take me literally hours of icon editing, and assembly I'd like to think that I have some say in the IP value of the themes I've put together. Clearly not in the free-for-all which is the K-Meleon world.
Al, quite a part of the skins that you're now claiming to be 'created solely for K-Ninja' were published earlier by you in the K-Meleon Wiki:
Themes by Al
I don't see any 'Provided courtesy...' or 'Permission granted...' statements there. When you license something from somebody you have to clearly say so! How should third persons know about it otherwise? That applies to both code that you are using in K-Ninja, and artwork that you are using in your skins.
Whether you have some say in the usage of your skins or not, depends on how you publish them! When you publish them under the GPL, you grant permission to everybody to use/modify/redistribute them - without asking you for permission! As I've mentioned before, K-Ninja is published under the GPL. There is no hint anywhere that K-Ninja skins are not GLPd.
From my point of you, you cannot first publish skins in the K-Meleon Wiki (or wherever) without any hint at possible legal restrictions and then claiming them to be 'created solely for K-Ninja' afterwards. That is like making a gift and then demanding it back.
Quote
Al.
In the case of Shartoo I even paid a licencing fee for use of the icons, about $100 from recollection. This I was doing as a service to all the K-Ninja users out there from my own pocket.
When you can provide any evidence that you've payed license fee for any artwork in guenter's packages, I will remove the affected packages from my site, of course.
Quote
Al.
Should also clear up the licensing text file was always included in the \K-Ninja2\ directory by default. All you had to do was look.
That's not sufficient to comply with the GPL.
Quote
Al.
As far as the GPL licencing thing well I just took over K-Ninja from where Mark Reaves left off. Whether or not it was in violation of any copywrite infringements I wasn't aware of.
That's no apology. When you modify and redistribute GPLd software, the original authors can expect at least that you preserve their copyright and that you make yourself familiar with the terms and conditions of the GPL in order to comply with this license. Or is that asked too much?
Quote
Al.
As it stands it doesn't make sense to me as to why you would even need a K-Ninja theme on K-Meleon, and the only way it appears to me is guenter obviously decided to try and shunt K-Ninja into the background by taking what themes were there and making them available for K-Meleon users.
Guessing about another person's intentions isn't very polite when this person isn't present and can't defend itself. Besides that, what you say about guenter can also be said about you. Think about this variation of your sentence:
As it stands it doesn't make sense to me as to why you would even need a K-Ninja, and the only way it appears to me is Al obviously decided to try and shunt K-Meleon into the background by taking the browser and clearing all traces of its actual origin.
Don't you think that you're somehow applying double standards?
Quote
Al.
As for me this is just the icing on the cake...
Think about it.
I do. But developers can never make it right for everybody. Users' needs and habits differ to much for that. From my point of view, it can't be fair either that the needs and habits of a few 'extremists', who are just crying the loudest, have more influence on the development then the needs of the quiet majority.
K-Ninja is no menace to me, it's just one K-Meleon modification among a lot of others - and it's not the only one that is violating the K-Meleon copyright and license. :p
Quote
Al.
Wow, finally the truth comes out. It would appear that K-Ninja has been a thorn in your side for quite some time now, otherwise why such a hefty reaction.
From my point of view, people who live in glass houses simply shouldn't throw stones. Maybe it would have been wiser to contact me through a private mail first...