Development :
K-Meleon Web Browser Forum
K-Meleon development related discussions.
latests cvs with mozilla 0.9.4
Posted by:
Gabriel Bouvigne
Date: October 31, 2001 03:36PM
I downloaded both today's cvs of k-meleon and the standard 0.9.4 mozilla release.
There are 2 things:
*I'm unable to locate the file "nsITooltipTextProvider.h" in my mozilla
*mozilla compilation didn't created any "embed" directory under projects/mozilla/dist/win32_o.obj
However I have an empty projects/mozilla/mozilla/dist/win32_o.obj/embed
I think that the second point is because I didn't put mozilla under projects/mozilla/mozilla like you, but projects/mozilla.
But because of the first point, I'm not sure If I can compile the latest k-meleon with 0.9.4. Which mozilla build did you used to build k-meleon 0.6?
Re: latests cvs with mozilla 0.9.4
Posted by:
Andrew
Date: October 31, 2001 03:53PM
0.6 was built with Mozilla 0.9.5.
Andrew
Re: latests cvs with mozilla 0.9.4
Posted by:
Gabriel Bouvigne
Date: November 02, 2001 11:16AM
Ok, I downloaded mozilla 0.9.5 and managed to build k-meleon. Thank you for your answer.
I've got one more question: is the cvs up to date? I'm asking because I used today's cvs, and I had to change a few things to get kmeleon compiling (missing cmdline.h/cpp into project, missing nsICacheService into stdafx.h), so I'm wondering if the cvs is really up to date.
Re: latests cvs with mozilla 0.9.4
Posted by:
Andrew
Date: November 02, 2001 02:05PM
Gabriel,
I can't answer that question but I do know that the developers have to do a few changes to get things to work. Post to the K-Meleon developers list for help.
Andrew
Re: latests cvs with mozilla 0.9.4
Posted by:
Jeff
Date: November 02, 2001 11:37PM
The cvs is relatively up to date (you should have everything you need to build with). I don't usually remember to commit changes to the project workspace (as it's not really a source file). It's also possible that stdafx.h is missing a line...it doesn't change frequently, so it's easy to forget to update it.
It sounds like you've fixed all that already, and just want to know if it's really the latest source: yes it is.
-- Jeff