Only one wish would be for Dorian ... Supporting singles folders in one of KM profile dir.(and Program Dir.) for extensions ... -like FF, TB and SM do.
Forum: General

ACM TMP cannot be ported to KM, because it's a firefox tabbrowser widget extension. Wait for tabbed K-Meleon like we do .
Forum: General

It looks something like that.. from much to less resources (about 40 tabs): firefox(because of heavy xul interface), k-meleon(layers), k-meleon(tabs) - perhaps in future.
Forum: General

There aren't supporting singles folders for each extensions ... Am I right ? Does it must be integrated in profile or KM folder ?
Forum: Development

enaitzjga When you use a lot of opened sites in layers ... - it take more system resources, instead of tabs.
Forum: General

Is .kmm macros files support icon for menus ? And will .kmm files readed by KM, if put it to extensions folder(in a folder of current extension) in KM-profile ? ( I need more information about that.... all I need is to install .xpi from FF with modified for KM installer(I've found 2 that installers) and then put .kmm files into current extension folder (in extensions folder in profile...
Forum: General

imho only reason is one ... - layers, which uses much of system resources ...(because one layer<=>one system window) in that case waiting for tabbing K-Meleon very much ...
Forum: Improvement requests

I've find a few xul FF extensions do that i wish ... I'll try to adop it later. Imho the best - installing .xpi, and ,if neded, write .kmm files ... So i'm closing my post .
Forum: Improvement requests

Ken It seems because of Gecko version ... (or site creators hands ) ...
Forum: General

Is it possible adopting FF\SM extensions for this version ? (and is it easy (with .kmm macro moduls) like for KM 1.1 ? )
Forum: General

Is K-Meleon1.5beta available for testing ? I have plans about adopting some xul extensions for KM ... And want that it would be on Tabbed KM version ... Can I be a beta(alfa) k-meleon tester ? (may be like trunks-builds tester in FF/SM/TB ).
Forum: Development

Imho, and not only mine - subj must be Ingegrated&Optional.
Forum: Improvement requests

JujuLand May be next version 1.0 will work ...
Forum: Improvement requests

Extension manager (based on XUL, like "options" in KM) like in FF or new 2a1 SM ... It will helps to get access to "Options" of Extensions(Add-ons), based basicaly on XUL. IMHO it can be copyed just from FF or SM... and would be easy first install FF/SM extension... and then modify it with including .kmm files in extension install folder.
Forum: Improvement requests

I want some future ... Possibility installation of .xpi(for example from FF site ..) by that - FF extension must be placed in KM profile folder (like doing in FF) And just put .kmm on place(or with place) of interface-.xul files And want that it works fine just normal FF extensions. (and in future - just use .kmm files on places of .xul files in .xpi modules. and install that modified
Forum: Improvement requests

Post the extensions you want compatible with K-Meleon. May by someone could stik this topic.
Forum: Improvement requests

Are there any plans for use FF structure instead SM ? (imho FF extensions will be more compatible, better extensions install)
Forum: General

JujuLand nope... it looks for changes in page. like mail etc. it has 1 xul config window and menus on options & tab rightclick. Would be very appreciated for that extension . It real enhance browsing...
Forum: General

Dorian said about TrueTabs just after 1.1 ... And will it(1.5) use Cairo or Unicode ?
Forum: General

JujuLand May I asked you about adopting for KM another one very usefull extension - Check4Change https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/3028 Thank you in advance.
Forum: General

DTA it's a XUL extension... like XUL Preferences in KM ... Has its own window... Is it possible don't start because it's FF extension ? (not SeaMonkey ..)
Forum: Improvement requests

guenter How i can understood, KM is based on SeaMonkey structure... May be became a time for FireFox structure in K-Meleon ? (imho many problems in extensions installation and compatibility should be out...)
Forum: Improvement requests

My imho .... ,basied on logical thinks . Yes, native calls are faster of all, but really are hard by programming and packing for extensions... . XUL - easy and most possibilities can give ...BUT very SLOW....(very-very ). BUT if lua and km macros real faster than XUL, and lua can give more possibility, why can't use lua ??? (And XUL no more simple that km macros, but there are exist a to
Forum: Improvement requests

QuoteJujuLandI have made extension to integrate some external downloaders (FreshDownload, wxDownload and Wackget), and these have resumable downloads. Isn't it enough for now ?? A+ High aim is imho DownThemAll!( http://www.downthemall.net/ ) functions. May be is available adopting this extension for KM ?
Forum: Improvement requests

"Add" option in "Extended properties" - "Files"(for now only- "Delete' and "Edit") To setup what to do with files by extensions. For example .zip files - saves with needed download manager. Plus new options to set variables for url, referer, cookie data, name, password (from browser). May be like %url%, %referer%, %cookiedata% . To past c
Forum: Bugs

Yes. But looks very pritty. Even Opera support it. imho it is nonstandart standart. But if no-MS - other else(MoFo or W3C) relese this future, don't we said that it's bad ?
Forum: Improvement requests

Just want that future to be integrated and may be used(activated) in command line.
Forum: Improvement requests

QuoteguenterQuoteD555I've haked .xpi too good, did You find a usefull one? Yes . I did it just to see the structure... . It's amazing - so much power in scripts - .js files ! It can do so much with Gecko API calls . By example with DownThemAll! extension ...
Forum: Improvement requests

Scroll Bar stiling by web pages - imho already an unofficial standart. It would be great to support it.
Forum: Improvement requests

I've haked .xpi too - therefore the idea was in easy modify .xpi for work with KM. Imho it needs just put on place(instead) of .xul interface files - .kmm files in .xpi package. May be it needs some detaled instructions(SDK ?) for people to easy start translate .xul into .kmm by wide masses of people .
Forum: Improvement requests