my casual comparison of KM vs. SeaMonkey -- in terms of speed and memory, they are running neck and neck.
often, SeaMonkey consumes less RAM than KM, both running several identical tabs.
after closing many tabs in SM, SM RAM footprint seems to take a long time to shrink (according to task manager). after exiting SeaMonkey, it takes a long time to unload from memory (after opening, then clo
Forum:
Improvement requests