I only want to say that you should check this thread on the second Tuesday of each month and check against the adobe version check site. If it match go for it. I won't post as long as gils does to avoid double posting of the same version. Gils don't hear our requests of "beta marking" the posts, so... we can't do anything else but follow the above guidelines. Oh,
Forum: General

Quotebellgamin QuoteJohnHell The case of Amazon is exactly this: a lazy webmasters that doesn't set the favicon, but then comes the browser to show it.It's not just Amazon. Hardly any of the sites I visit don't show favicons without the fix you provided. Yes, that is what is sad. There are a lot of sites like Amazon that lack of the favicon link in the html code. When I use F
Forum: Bugs

Quotesiria If you happen to have a tip... I'm sticky with Office 2000 (around 200M. But if you mean a tiny spreadsheet. I don't know of any one
Forum: Extensions

Quotesiria Frankly I don't care how it works, as long as it works ;-) If you don't care about breaking the web Or webmasters not doing its job because browser does for them. And then we blame them for other things as don't recognize K-meleon... I don't like things doing what shouldn't do because in absence of favicon (in this case), let's use the backdoor :
Forum: Bugs

40Mb is not small, that's for sure. Those in the snapfiles search are nearest to my concept of tiny. It was an old application. I'm talking about 10 years ago, if not more. Now I'm not searching for it. I was just saying that it was a shame I can't remember it because could make a "professional" file making look better the help file (and I'm not saying you
Forum: Extensions

Playing and playing, as it needs a restart... it is this: browser.chrome.favicons That preference is set as false by default in K-meleon (playing fair). If you want to go other browsers path (not playing fair) set it to true. Why I insist in playing fair? Imaging a web developer that removed the favicon for any reason from the html code but didn't remove the icon file from the
Forum: Bugs

I already made searches, but it wasn't one of those. It was kind of a custom tiny application to make simple help files. It was referenced in a help file itself pointing "this html file was made with XXXXX". I can't remember that XXXXX. Kind of tools like appear in sites like nirsoft.
Forum: Extensions

The problem is that it isn't exactly a bug. The other day I found it, but I don't remeber what exactly was involved (fish memory). Anyway, why I said it isn't exactly a bug? because probably you have seen the icons in other browsers and those browsers aren't playing fair. Amazon, the example you gave, hasn't a meta favicon descriptor in the html. In other words,
Forum: Bugs

I updated the initial post of this thread with an updated file as I corrected typos in the Readme.txt and your screenshots. I didn't include the screenshots in the file to avoid any kind of confussion. I bet someone decompress them in the macro folder, even the readme instructions. The readme wasn't professional just as those that are inside tiny applications. I love tiny applica
Forum: Extensions

Quotesiria But perhaps I should predict you, next thing will be that someone comes and wants a standard-kmext-7z with folder structure inside I bet for it. It's so hard to open a zip file and to read the Readme Attached with readme changed.
Forum: Extensions

Didn't you say to remove version number? I didn't know 1.7 had the same pre-enabled javascript requirements as 74 GRE 31 :-? I have some alpha here what I played with it just a few minutes... time ago. What exactly to add to the readme, the whole header? If not, paste here what you consider will be best. Ok, about the hint. Readme is overrated It is as Windows programs ins
Forum: Extensions

I changed the filename, the header, the script itself with a few improvements and the readme. Don't pay too much attention to the zip filename it is for our versioning tracking. The filename inside is DocInfoMore.kmm. The header now is as follows: # UTF-8 / K-Meleon Macros (http://kmeleon.sourceforge.net/wiki/index.php?id=MacroLanguage2) # ---------------------- DocInfoMore.kmm --
Forum: Extensions

Quotesiria that JS-toggles after page load are simply ignored! I wish I just came here 10 minutes ago Exactly, it is just ignored. You have to reload or open again the page after toggle it or... nothing :/
Forum: Extensions

There is no need of toogle JS or popups before execute the macro. Most of the times I'm with both disabled. And sometimes JS enabled and popups disabled. And worked ever in 1.6 and works in 74.0 GRE 24.7. For 74 GRE 31, by what Dorian said about injectJS, probably will need to toggle JS enabled before run it. I'm doing some testings with CSS images warning and other improvem
Forum: Extensions

1.6 didn't need anything under Windows 2000 :-? Only with Flash. The problem came with 74, as it needed wrappers.
Forum: Announcements

You really like to change things or you are just trying to make me go crazy What was the complain about? I fixed a couple of errors you introduced I don't know how or probably it was the forum DocInfoMore_v6.kmm I also removed the warning for non CSS backround images found. I found an error and I learned a new thing about arrays. And until I found or think any better way (I
Forum: Extensions

Latest version and probably the last unless you polish it: DocInfoMore_multiversionv5.kmm It includes a workaround to warn when not found CSS background imges.
Forum: Extensions

I only post the following code to highlight changes. Please, consider to copy it from here because I had to remove code as the forum gave errors: http://www.geocities.ws/jothache/codigov4.html No files anymore for distribution. Polish as you wish. EDIT: I didn't remove the 1.6 reference in the description. This is a multiversion macro now. #ß UTF-8 / K-Meleon Macros (h
Forum: Extensions

Quotesiria We both just want things to be cleanly organised How about a compromise for the mind health of both, the developer and the user? Lets say we have the macro first try to read a js-file, for testing and understanding the code, and only if that's not found it uses the fallback code inside the kmm, for which the "complete" script would suffice IMO (=be enough)? I still
Forum: Extensions

Ok, 1.6 fixed There was something I barely remember I did. It bugged me and probably that's the reason I left the three alerts for when I changed to K-meleon 74. Something in the javascript core was changed that added quotes :-? If you don't want/can't download the files, just replace the text "bgtmpurl.substr(5, bgtmpurlL-7);" with "bgtmpurl.substr(4, bgtmp
Forum: Extensions

Suffer? Won't suffer to split it and then rejoin with $1.$2. Anyway, doing it we will be "only" saving 2000 bytes, it isn't a big waste. But for cleanliness I prefer it in a separate way. It is easier to track the code. After you gave me the candy of external files (that can be with formatted text inside), don't take away from me Also you have to take care of the use
Forum: Extensions

QuoteYogi QuoteZero3K I can confirm that it crashes when right-clicking anywhere in any page. Confirmed. K-Meleon 74 / Gecko 31 (fresh install) Nice to have "about: preferences" :cool: I tested for about 20 minutes (no wild, without internet access) and I confirm partially the bug. For example, if you block K-meleon access to the net and go to a site, in the resulting error
Forum: Development

Quotesiria Glad you're doing the really complicated part QuoteJohnHellThe second is because of how the JS_hndlDocs/hndlDocs work. Can't do anything there. But that I still don't understand. Of course you can do it different, if you know a better code for this case. Why insist in using hndlDocs instead of just merging the definition and execution together, like a bookmarklet j
Forum: Extensions

Version 2. Those who downloaded the separate js files, redownload them again as have been changed. I need just to confirm if the menus are correctly set as I'm a disaster with setmenu For the rest it should work. I included the array check to avoid duplicates and it amazed it didn't took as long as I thought. Yay! Known issues: - won't alert when there aren't a
Forum: Extensions

Quotesiria John it seems to me exactly like the workaround in KM1.7, you can simply replace all your codes with open(javascript:...). Hmm, thinking about, not even that is now guaranteed anymore, have recently read something that Mozilla forbid that too in some newer version, to run a script from URLbar etc.!! Just hope this can be workedaround by our devs. But injectjs has never autoexecuted
Forum: Development

Quotesiria But another user here is running KM74 on win2000 in some virtual XP thing ;-) A dll wrapper, not a virtual machine**. But in some ways we could call it virtualization as it is not native ** when you read me about a virtual machine is when I have to test in a more normal environment as in windows 2000 I'm running things in the edge with possible unexpected results.
Forum: Announcements

QuoteDorian [*] The function used by injectjs does not exist anymore, I had to switch to the old version used by km 1.1 (which just inject a <script> in the page). For better result, it probably need to be rewritten in js ... In street language. What that implies? That now you must call the function name inside JS_func/JSfunc with the mandatory JS_doit/JSdoit? In other works, it
Forum: Development

And Siria, how is it that the macro modification you posted works for you? I run in a clean profile and it doesn't display the images. Also it doesn't make the links with a working link. The text link is correct. The link itself not.
Forum: Extensions

Quotesiria Well it does work to show definitely more images that otherwise I couldn't access at all For Bing there might be a workaround via UA, but doesn't help everywhere, e.g. not here - this needs your script to work: www.piper.de/buecher/neuerscheinungen And hey, there's no obligation to use hndlDocs if you prefer to use some other code instead. Just injectJS(code) can us
Forum: Extensions

Quotesiria Just a thought: perhaps decide automatically with a counter? If <30 pics => show ALL If 30+ pics => ask user Would the <img> macro show the same as the native macro? Because the native one eliminates duplicates... I'm discovering that the original script has been changed somewhere between my initial post in 2012 and now so, my script isn't being hand
Forum: Extensions