It works on 2000 too.
Forum: Development

Quotesiria QuoteJohnHellWill test, but, at first sight, I see where our differences were... about:blank != chrome[...]blank.html Behaves absolutely different than about:blank, then, yes, hashes and whatever might work another way. And I don't remember you mentioning that URL. innerHTML, yeah, might be the culprit. I should have used outerHTML, probably, as HTML shouldn't be replaced
Forum: Extensions

Will test, but, at first sight, I see where our differences were... about:blank != chrome[...]blank.html Behaves absolutely different than about:blank, then, yes, hashes and whatever might work another way. And I don't remember you mentioning that URL. innerHTML, yeah, might be the culprit. I should have used outerHTML, probably, as HTML shouldn't be replaced either ways, but, anyway
Forum: Extensions

I attached a hard disk to this PC that I didn't remember it had a Windows 7 virtual machine (from 2012!!). Anyway, I could test 76 without reboot to other system and tested again, again, again, and unless you call an alert, on opennew, or injectJS(window.open), the result doesn't get rendered. Note: ... on Goanna and I didn't want to test RC or RC2. After all, the three behav
Forum: Extensions

Quotesiria Anyone here who could test this in Win2000 and XP SP2 too? It does work on SP2, but can't see how useful can be, beyond the system/version/troubleshot/whateverICan'tRemember info macro.
Forum: Development

Quotesiria I mean: visitors look at a browser homepage, and get a prominent warning Oooohhh, ok, ok, I misunderstand that. Quotesiria I must reload every post even 2-4 times, and wait for yet more timeouts in between! It has become "almost" impossible to post. Don't know if things are equally bad for other users Since the problems a month back now things are swiftly agai
Forum: Development

Quotesiria What I find interesting, have recently learned there are also some disadvantages to httpS: httpS needs certificates, and website or blog owners must BUY them! One of the main reasons that sites have switched (in opposition to offer) encrypted version of the pages, is because there is no need to pay anymore, except for more "serious" trust, with the "Let's encry
Forum: Development

Quotesiria And it's also not true that in KM76 both open-methods would need alerts. The macro-open method works without it. Have verified that repeatedly, but as long as that's against a theory it's useless. Then is me who is hallucinating, because I tested on the three 76 versions and both, injectJS(window.open) and opennew(), needed the damn alert or couldn't injectJS(inn
Forum: Extensions

Quotesiria But try the usual methods, for example RIGHT-clicking on a link and try to open it this way in a new page: zero chance. With url "about:blank" the engine thinks the current tab is empty and useless, available to be filled in all possible ways. Another thing impossible by definition. And I admit I didn't test on 76 (god!, ever worked on any version), but if you rig
Forum: Extensions

You focus in this last post on JavaScript. Forget JavaScript. As I said, there were no differences between opening it through JavaScript or through opennew. The results is exactly the same. For old versions (75.1 and below), the macro remains the same, relaying in the same macro/script (newer script, with objects, nothing special). The rest is just for K-meleon 76. I already said that
Forum: Extensions

QuoteVaganza Have you tried the site yourself through K-Meleon ? No, as I'm not using the latest, nor I have a microphone, but I directed you were the permissions are to give a try
Forum: Bugs

Maybe you want to have a look to about:permissions internal URL. There are the permissions for microphone, camera, etc.
Forum: Bugs

If panzer accepts post a link to the blog/page, if you wish. No one is banning your posts or censoring them, panzer, just a was an opinion.
Forum: Off-Topic

Updated file with final version in first post.
Forum: Extensions

I don't think it is that, at least the preloadlist, because it is enabled by default in K-meleon 75 and doesn't redirect on error trying to find the httpS version of the URL... One thing is enable HSTS, that accepts HSTS request from a website; the other based on saved sites, switch to TLS; and what was happening with Goanna, that, on error, with a PC without network, without even ab
Forum: K-Meleon on Goanna

A couple of issues, roytam1: First, the damn black rendering issue described in the latest posts of the Image retrieving macro: http://kmeleonbrowser.org/forum/read.php?9,123209,150919,page=3#msg-150919 Even if it has been carried since 76.0 Gecko and you only do, mostly, engine updates, give a look. The issue, basically, is that new windows opened don't render its content and disp
Forum: K-Meleon on Goanna

Quotesiria I can upload James' last KM1.6 package to a hoster if you like. The link in rodocop's archiv has long since become inaccessible too. Oh no.... just occured to me to open my own old beta2 copy, and - you're right, it's the version! The last available KM1.6 beta2 from 2010 is still completely BUGGY, and inject returns only some 120 characters! And no unicode! T
Forum: Extensions

Quotesiria Just checked again what works in my troubleshoot_prefs macro, for all versions: $_trbpCode=$_trbpCode."document.documentElement.innerHTML=page; document.close(); "; $_trbprfFIN="(function() {".$_trbpCode."})()"; That document.close() does nothing there without a document.write() first. Quotesiria QuoteJohnHellJust tested again, that I don't
Forum: Extensions

QuoteJohnHell Quotesiria Quotethe return output from JavaScript is limited to 127 characters, now that you did want to investigate it. Huh?? What makes you think so? inject-return always delivered about 4000 characters in older KM. My current hover macro has proven that too, once again. The one major prob are doublebyte characters, in cyrillic or asian languages. Is what test gave as a result
Forum: Extensions

Quotesiria Not gotten around yet, but will try the new version soon. Quotethey can capture and open a new window with the results for about:home, about:blank and file:/// (local page). As said above, I didn't test live HTTP, but, if it works in my current 75.0 installation, what could go wrong? A lot. It was rhetorical. It works in K-meleon 75.x with live http procol, but as these v
Forum: Extensions

Quotesiria QuoteJohnHell Personally, I don't use the window styling, but I left there as legacy purposes. Also, the window is quite small for current days, but is what is set in docinfo.kmm, or main kmm, in root K-meleon macros folder We all know large parts of the browser and website are some 15 years old, but frankly, that's IMO no reason to still code for 640px screens :cool: Re
Forum: Extensions

Personally, I don't use the window styling, but I left there as legacy purposes. Also, the window is quite small for current days, but is what is set in docinfo.kmm, or main kmm, in root K-meleon macros folder Before further tests on my side, looks like the macro might be working correctly and the black issue is the same as other users have reported in the past, that, despite telling a
Forum: Extensions

Disable hardware acceleration, just in case. You know, the boolean preference "layers.acceleration.disabled" set to true. Screenshots would help too.
Forum: Extensions

Quotesiria v11 beta6: new window still completely broken, except titlebar. The error is gone now. In beta5 it was in the console, in bold font. Now the console remains empty. Starting to wonder, perhaps we should start googling around for Firefox and transparent windows?? Will take a look.... Transparent or empty?, as it was black earlier... If so, is definitely the hardware acceleration,
Forum: Extensions

(Damn scripts out there forced the browser to close while replying!!!) That is what macro does, siria, retrieve the output in portions. Is nothing time consuming and nothing hard. You amazed me that it doesn't allow to modify the content. That would mean that literally blocks any javascript command from any source to document.open()/write()/close() because the rest of the script isn�
Forum: Extensions

Quotepanzer Back in the day there were not as many freeware around like today. I use my sister's mobile phone and post my finds one by one so I do not close a tab by mistake and lose all finds for that day. This is why my post have so many edits lately. I do not post spam. The problem is not to be considered as Spam or not. The point of all this is that your posts looks more like
Forum: Off-Topic

Ok, this is beta 5 but THIS, finally works. What was happening? I remember, without searching, complaining, in this exact same thread, about the damn hndlDocs and the JavaScript in one line. And, in the end, THAT is what caused everything. One thing that I'll never understand is WHY Dorian, or the original creator of hndlDocs, or who later made the scripts as the original "Page
Forum: Extensions

Updated beta 4 again.
Forum: Extensions

Updated to beta 4 Quotesiria Just did a quick prelim test now on sp3, to see at least if the new window opens and fills fine, but must disappoint you: nothing happens. The console reports only: KM_docinfo_more_cnt is not defined. When I give it some test string where it's created first, that error goes away, but still nothing happens. Tested with JS allowed and Popups allowed, on
Forum: Extensions

QuoteMello Does disabling js help? If it is a generic question to the topic, and not a question for clutterless, the answer is no. Disabling JavaScript would help to lower the CPU load, but nothing else. Yes, for huge images (thousand pixels wide) would help, but not if the server is busy.
Forum: K-Meleon on Goanna