Weird... Checked my various test profile names now: 5 have the same name as default, and 3 have other names! But I cannot manage to create another "same" one now. Even if "Ask at startup" is disabled again (the first thing I always activate in new installs) and the default session active again. And not the slightest idea what suddenly "switched" the new name
Forum: Bugs

QuotestanAt the moment it takes 10 to 15 seconds to type in the url that I want to visit. Without a bookmark, this is what I have to do. Is there any way to save the address instead of having to re-type it each day? Yikes... I don't know if a bookmark-search is possible in urlbar in KM yet, but there are certainly a couple alternative ways to easier access a webpage that is used daily.
Forum: Improvement requests

Am wondering if those "behaviour" prefs really do work in KM? That is, allow searching not only in history, but also in bookmarks? Now I have some minor testing probs in 74 myself ;-P, but this page: QuoteMozillahttp://kb.mozillazine.org/Changing_autocomplete_behavior_-_Firefox In Firefox 3 and above, when you start typing into the Location Bar, the autocomplete drop-down will s
Forum: General

Oh, yet another... hmm... let me guess, it's just a renamed copy of rvj-editor? Or not? But please, do a little **TEST** before publishing the final version. You guys never seem to test your own stuff! As this thread has shown again and again and again, and I don't get it... While I see already at first look another little menu glitch.... but I leave the discovery to your test, it&
Forum: General

WHOAA.... today it's in a really deep coma!!! Has been bad a few times before, but now nearly impossible to get through! What's happening? Slowly getting really concerned
Forum: Off-Topic

Quoteguenter You IMHO knew why You used pref-filetypes.xul instead of pref.xul in Your macro. So do I. That elegantly avoided the problem, same name, same ID. LOL! Yes I know why, but you're assuming wrong again You still cling to your deep conviction that it must be something "complicated", but really, the name of the link targets don't make any problems (they ARE diff
Forum: General

QuoteguenterBoth items called by the two macros have the name "pref.xul" and the same "ID". IMHO that is the deeper reason. Since Your macro works around this problem As mentioned, my macro doesn't touch those and the editors still work fine (in KM1.6), but since you use more files for KM74, rdf etc., who knows what those do. But why don't you simply rename the
Forum: General

Quoteguenter the reason is IMHO in the XUL code. Both items called by the two macros have the name "pref.xul" and the same "ID". IMHO that is the deeper reason. Since Your macro works around this problem You have found this out too.. No, sorry, can't be. Or do you see anything in my macro code that would modify the name of those xul files or their IDs?? The truth is mu
Forum: General

QuoteJujuLandYou seem to give the good reason, that Dorian has used 1.54 as base instead of 1.60, and the improvments made by desga have been lost ... Uh?? You are writing yourself that a main.kmm that contains desgas modifications SOLVES a problem, which means his main.kmm must be BETTER than the old one - and then you draw the conclusion that this would prove it's a good thing his impro
Forum: Bugs

Much better. Almost matches again mine and guenters cleaned up version on the first page :cool: Except one important point that's still missing. So, since we still can't find an agreement about allowing the native editor too, I finally decided to give in and create a "fork" macro. Did some testing now, just trial-and-error, and to my pleasant surprise found that KM1.6 can
Forum: General

Thanks. That much again for immediately jumping to "system fault" as soon as something doesn't work at first try :cool: Perhaps that pref tab was one of desgas improvements that Dorian had lost when building KM74 based on an older version...? Although it's strange, because the "search" macro uses "OpenURL_Typed" acc. its kmm... Torbetron: if you h
Forum: Bugs

In KM1.6 that is the pref that's changed with the method I posted at 18:44. Does KM74 have that pref tab too? If yes, does it work? Oops, posted at same time, my reply was to James yet.. Alain, that main-kmm thing that you keep mentioning, really doesn't change from "open window" into "open tab". It merely uses a new pref, and then decides if a few certain com
Forum: Bugs

Don't you all jump so quickly now to blame everything on the system if something doesn't work immediately on XP or Linux now. Speaking from experience - 90% of the things that didn't work right away in 98 and people just kept telling "must be your system" turned out after a bit more research to have nothing to do with the system, but really some browser or macro bug. And
Forum: Bugs

F2 > Browsing > Finding Websites > Search Button Hope that's right, only looked it up in my current KM1.6, and never noticed that tab before ;-)
Forum: Bugs

Of course the mime-html can't work with your jar, because you keep that file in the chrome parent folder instead of the chrome content pref folder. Move it there and try again? QuoteJujuLandok, but if someone wants to change this behavior, he must change the macro, else just a pref, which can be done if Dorian accept to reintroduce it, with a included macro or in kmprefs. The way your m
Forum: General

QuoteJujuLandhere is the modified main.kmm which allows to have functions like about, ... to be opened in a new tab instead of a new window (but which also allows new window. Now we have the choice ... Yes that attachment contains the main.kmm modifications that were introduced in KM1.6, guess by desga in a later beta version but not sure anymore. And then Dorian dropped them again because he r
Forum: General

You can remove me from the history, since it doesn't contain any contributions by me. And even if there were a line, that would be peanuts not worth mentioning considering it would be 0.0x % of that whole extension. What I still keep riddling, what's your "modified version of main.kmm" thing about? Some trick requiring frames? (sorry am lazy too and too bothersome to get
Forum: General

QuoteguenterQuotesiriaPerhaps some path mistake in this mime-extension itself? 2.) Impossible. That is an anciant part of the Mozilla/SeaMoney suite XUL code. .... The basic code is not by a Bob Janc or a guenter but we just altered it to work with a new app and do the job after some other codes changed. LOL! Okay, so let me rephrase it more precisely: Perhaps some path mistake in tho
Forum: General

QuoteJujuLand$OpenURL=($tux==""?"chrome://rvjmimeedit/content/mimeType.html" : "file:///".getfolder(RootFolder)."/browser/extensions/ {fb4eaeed-d1c9-45d1-a2bb-f2876142daf0}/mimetype.html"); Still, the 7z by you and the one by guenter have a different folder structure. This command cannot possibly work if the windows-line looks for the hmtl-page in the
Forum: General

Those complicated addon-extension paths are a complete mystery to me yet, so I had just kept the original paths you guys have posted. Now came across this (VERY long) page about the structure of FF addons. It contains also a chrome chapter, but no mention that chrome-paths wouldn't work under Linux. Perhaps some path mistake in this mime-extension itself? https://developer.mozilla.org
Forum: General

Just came across this comprehensive description of the various profile paths in different systems. No idea if that's of any use here, but just in case: http://kb.mozillazine.org/Profile_folder_-_Firefox One interesting thing is that the FF profiles parent folder is hidden by default. Or a much shorter version: www.askvg.com/list-of-files-that-can-be-hacked-to-configure-firefox
Forum: Development

QuoteLarkspurI'd created a restore point just before the installation, but after performing the Restore, 6.1 remained thoroughly screwed up. https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Mozilla/About_omni.ja_(formerly_omni.jar) QuoteMozilla Starting with Firefox 10 and Thunderbird 10, the file extension .ja is used because Windows System Restore does not back up files with the .jar extensio
Forum: Extensions

QuoteJamesDThere should be a new item named "Open Internal" in Images. My first thought: perhaps you clicked the native command again instead of the new one...? QuoteRain in a new window instead of opening them in the same and/or new tab What do you prefer, same tab or new tab?
Forum: General

About this complicated addon-extension path stuff I have no experience myself. Had just kept the original paths in your and jujulands macro. But great if those shorter and direct links work too Just one little syntax error: $OpenURL="chrome://rvjmimeedit/content/mimeType.html"; &OpenURL_InNewWindow;&OpenURL_InNew; And the header now sounds like it wouldn't need an
Forum: General

Thank you too for testing
Forum: General

Yet a better example is yahoo.com. Or the news site: http://de.nachrichten.yahoo.com When blocking document colors ALL images vanish?! (or is that somehow another user setting of mine?? So much has accumulated over time...) And when searching text inside a page and highlighting all hits (Ctrl+F), then the highlight-colors vanish too. Funnily, I have an extra glaring style for them via a
Forum: General

addons.mozilla.org is a nice test page. When only setting "browser.display.background_color" that has zero effect. Page remains white. When also blocking "browser.display.use_document_colors" the colors change, but the starlet-icons vanish too. Not quite sure why, but probably are covered by a forced background-color on all elements. With my css-snippet above only the
Forum: General

Exactly Preferably with encoding UTF-8, but in this case it probably doesn't matter since there are no special characters in it.
Forum: General

Hm, but when I play a youtube video, it only starts *loading* when I click the arrow. Before not, or the red progress line would be much further already. Wondering, perhaps it has to do with the Link-prefetching pref?? But no idea. (in KM16 in F2 > Privacy > Paranoia) I also keep the pref for embedded objects blocked during normal surfing.
Forum: General

I've struggled endlessly with that recently! But found no way other than a user style css, and it has a lot of drawbacks. For specific sites specific solutions can be found, but a global style that works acceptable on ALL sites? No chance. The main prob is, forcing a background-color will hide many images! Not just real -unimportant- "background" images, but also important one
Forum: General